Abedi, J., & Dietel, R. (2004, Winter). Challenges in the No Child Left Behind Act for English language learners. CRESST Policy Brief 7. Available online: http://cresst.org/products/newsletters/policybrief7.pdf
Ainley, M. (2004). What do we know about student motivations and engagement? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, Nov. 29-Dec. 2.
Airasian, P. (1997). Classroom assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Aldrich, C. (2003). Simulations and the future of learning. New York: Pfeiffer.
Alexander, P.A. (1984). Training analogical reasoning skills in the gifted. Roeper Review, 6(4), 191-193.
Alexander, P.A., Kulikowich, J.M., & Schulze, S.K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 313-337.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Anderman, L.H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Motivation and middle school students [ERIC digest]. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 421 281)
Anderson, J. R. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1986). The value of taking notes during lectures (Tech. Rep. No. 374). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman and Center for the Study of Reading, Urbana, Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 277 996)
Anderson, V., & Hidi, S. (1988/1989). Teaching students to summarize. Educational Leadership, 46, 26-28.
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Applications and misapplications of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Unpublished manuscript. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology.
Antunez, B. (2000). When everyone is involved: Parents and communities in school reform. In Framing effective practice: Topics and issues in the education of English language learners (pp. 53-59). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Available online: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/tasynthesis/framing/6parents.htm
Armbruster, B.B., Anderson, T.H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Improving content-area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 393-416.
Arter, J. (1995). Portfolios for assessment and instruction. Greensboro, NC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Guidance. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 388890).
Aschbacher, P.R., & Herman, J. (1991, Fall). Final report of the Humanitas program evaluation, 1990-1991. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
Audet, R. & Ludwig, G. (Eds.). (2000). GIS in schools. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
Aune, B. (2000). Links between research and reform. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Children, Families, and Learning.
Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267-272.
Bain, A., & Ross, K. (2000). School reengineering and SAT-1 performance: A case study. International Journal of Education Reform, 9(2), pp. 148-153.
Balli, S.J. (1998). When mom and dad help: Student reflections on parent involvement with homework. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 31(3), 142-148.
Bangert-Downs, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effects of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238. Bank Street Learning Six Domains of Teaching. http://www.bankstreet.edu/tne/domains.html
Barron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271-312.
Beane, James A (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bednarz, S.W. (1999, July). Impact and success: Evaluation of the GIS Institute for Teachers. Paper presented at the ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, CA.
Bess, J. L. (1997). Teaching well and liking it. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C.E. (2004). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Available online: http://www.all4ed.org/publications/ReadingNext/ReadingNext.pdf
Bierhler, R. & Snowman, J. (1997). Psychology applied to teaching (8th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Bloom, Benjamin S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1, Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
Blank, W. (1997). Authentic instruction. In W.E. Blank & S. Harwell (Eds.), Promising practices for connecting high school to the real world (pp.15-21). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED407586)
Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (1985). What is reflection in learning? In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. (pp. 7-17). London: Kogan Page.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brodie, K., Carpenter, L., Earnshaw, R., Gallop, J., Hubbold, R., Mumford, A., Osland, C., & Quarendon, P. (1992). Scientific Visualization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Brookbank, D., Grover, S., Kullberg, K., & Strawser, C. (1999). Improving student achievement through organization of student learning. Chicago: Master's Action Research Project, Saint Xavier University and IRI/Skylight. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED435094)
Brophy, J.E. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research 51(1): 5-32.
Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-24.
Butler, K., & Gregorc, A. Learning and teaching style: A status report. In NASSP Curriculum Report 12(4). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Caine, R.N., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Caine, R.N., & Caine, G. (1997a). Education on the edge of possibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Caine, R.N., & Caine, G. (1997b). Unleashing the power of perceptual change: The potential of brain-based teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Cameron, J., & Pierce, W.D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.
Carr, M. (2002). Inquiring minds: Learning and literacy in early adolescence. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Chen, Z. (1999). Children's analogical problem solving: The effects of superficial, structural, and procedural similarities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62(3), 410-431.
Chen, Z., Yanowitz, K.L., & Daehler, M.W., (1996). Constraints on accessing abstract source information: Instantiation of principles facilitates children's analogical transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 87(3), 445-454.
Clinchy, E. (1996, December). Reforming American education from the bottom to the top: Escaping academic captivity. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(4), 268-270.
Coley, R., Cradler, J. & Engel, P. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center, 37.
Cooper, J. (1999). The teacher as a decision maker. In Classroom teaching skills. (6th ed.) James M. Cooper (ed.), pp. 1-19. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Covington, M.V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Covington, M. (1999). Caring about learning: The nature and nurturing of subject-matter appreciation. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 127-137.
Cowan, J. (1998). On becoming an innovative university teacher: Reflection in action. The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Craske, M. L. (1985). Improving persistence through observational learning and attribution retraining. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 138-147.
Crawford, L. W. (1993). Language and literacy learning in multicultural classrooms. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Crooks, T.J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathune, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Curtis, M., Luchini, K., Bobrowsky, W., Quintana, C., & Soloway, E. (2002). Handheld use in K-12: A descriptive account. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Vaexjoe, Sweden. Available online: http://java.cs.vt.edu/public/classes/communities/readings/Curtis-Soloway-2002.pdf
Dempsey, J.V., Rasmussen, K., & Lucassen, B. (1994). Instructional gaming: Implications for instructional technology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 16-20 February, 1994, Nashville, TN.
Dempsey, J.V., Casey, M.S., Haynes, L.L., & Lucassen, B.A. (1996). Instructional applications of computer games. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, 8-12 April 1996, New York. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 500.
Dempsey, J.V., Casey, M.S., Haynes, L.L., & Lucassen, B.A. (2002). Forty simple computer games and what they could mean to educators. Simulation and Gaming, 33(2), 157-168.
Denner, P.R. (1986). Comparison of the effects of episodic organizers and traditional notetaking on story recall (Final Report). Idaho State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 270 731)
Dev, P.C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: What does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18(1), 12-19.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.
Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (1997). Young adolescent development. In J.L. Irvin (Ed.), What research says to the middle level practitioner. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 847)
Edelman, G.M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic.
Edelson, D. C. Matching the Design of Activities to the Affordances of Software to Support Inquiry-Based Learning. School of Education and Social Policy and Institute for the Learning Sciences. Northwestern University. Available online: http://www.worldwatcher.northwestern.edu/userdownloads/pdf/Edelson_icls98.pdf
Edens, K. & Gredler, M. (1990). A further analysis of computer-based simulations. Simulations/Games for Learning 19(2).
Edwards, K., Ellis, D., Ko, L., Saifer, S., & Stuczynski, A. (in press). Classroom to community and Back: Using culturally responsive standards-based teaching to strengthen family and community partnerships and increase student achievement. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Einspruch, E., Grover, J., Hahn, K., Guy, T., and Deck, D. (2001). Washington State Readiness to Learn: School-linked models for integrated family services 1999-2001 evaluation report. Portland, OR: RMC Research Corporation. Prepared for the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://www.k12.wa.us/ReadinessToLearn/pubdocs/Report2001-02.pdf
Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985, October). Notetaking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 522-532.
Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Fillippone, M. (1998). Questioning at the elementary level. Master's thesis, Kean University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 417 421).
Fowler, T.W. (1975, March). An investigation of the teacher behavior of wait-time during an inquiry science lesson. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Los Angeles. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 108 872).
Foyle, H. & Bailey, G. (1988). Homework experiments in social studies: Implications for teaching. Social-Education, 52(4), pp 292-94, 296-98.
Foyle, H., Lyman, L., Tompkins, L., Perne, S., & Foyle, D. (1990). Homework and cooperative learning: A classroom field experiment. Illinois School Research and Development, 29(3), 25-27.
Frasca, G. (2001). Videogames of the oppressed. M.A. Thesis: School of Literature, Communication and Culture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta. Available online: http://www.ludology.org/articles/thesis
Fraser, B. J.,Walberg, H. J., Welch, W.W., & Hattie, J.A. (1987). Synthesis of educational productivity research [Special issue]. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 145-252.
Fullan, M., (2004). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gee, J. P. (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Glennan, T. K., & Melmed, A. (1996 ). Fostering the use of educational technology: Elements of a national strategy (MR-682-OSTP/ED). Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Retrieved April 8, 2002, from http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR682/.
Goddard, R.D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W.K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 3-17.
Good, T.L., & Brophy, J.E. (1984). Looking in classrooms. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R.D. (1995). Prospects for visualization as an educational technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 249-279.
Gredler, M. E. (1990) Analyzing deep structure in games and simulations. Simulations/Games for Learning 20(3), 329-34.
Gredler, M. E. (1994). Designing and evaluating games and simulations: A process approach. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Gredler, M. E. (1996). Educational games and simulations: A technology in search of a (research) paradigm. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 521-540). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil, R. Barr, P. Mosenthal & D. Pearson. Handbook of Reading Research III. (pp. 403-425). New York: Longman.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.
Hart, L.A. (1983). Human brain and human learning. Arizona: Books for Educators.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L.S. (1980) Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg and R. Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3-30.
Healy, J. M. (1990). Endangered minds: Why our children don't think. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Heath, S. B. & Mangiola, L. (1991). Children of promise: Literate activity in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Henderson, R.W., & Landesman, E.M. (1992). Mathematics and middle school students of Mexican descent: The effects of thematically integrated instructions (Research Rep. No. 5). Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, National Center for Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
Henderson, A.T., & Mapp, K.L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, National Center for Family & Community Connections with Schools.
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1987). Providing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Reviewing Educational Research, 56, 473-493.
Hood, P. (1997). Simulation as a tool in education research and development. EdTalk: US.
Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual tools for constructing knowledge. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hyerle, D. (1996). Thinking maps: Seeing is understanding. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 85-89.
International Reading Association. (2001). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum. Author. Available online: http://www.reading.org/resources/issues/positions_technology.html
International Society for Technology in Education. (1999). National educational technology standards for students: Connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR: Author. Available online: http://cnets.iste.org/students/s_book.html
Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal,21(4), 767-787. Jewett, J. (1994). Physics begins with an m... mysteries, magic, and myth. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47-62. Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. California: Author.
Kahle, A.L., & Kelly, M.L. (1984). Children's homework problems: A comparison of goal setting and parent training. Behavior Therapy, 25(2), 275-290.
Kaufmann II, W.J., & Smarr, L.L. (1993). Supercomputing and transformation of science. New York: Scientific American Library.
Keiper, T. (1999). GIS for elementary students: An inquiry into a new approach to learning geography. Journal of Geography (98), 47-59.
Keith, T. Z & Cool, V. A. (1992). Teaching models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 209-226.
Kerbow, D. (1995). Pervasive student mobility: A moving target for school improvement. Chicago, IL: Chicago Panel on School Research.
Kimble, C. (1999). The impact of technology on learning. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory. Available at http://www.mcrel.org
Kindsvatter, R., Wilen, W., Ishler, M. (1996). Dynamics of Effective Teaching (3rd. ed.) White Plains, NY: Longman.
Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning as the science of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Kovalik, S. (1994). Integrated thematic instruction: The model. Kent, WA: Susan Kovalik & Associates.
Kozma, R. (Ed.), (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Educational Technology.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Book 2: Affective domain. New York: Longman.
Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.L.C. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity and Excellence, 23, 22-30.
Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.L.C. (1991). Research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 777)
Lavoie, D.R. (1999). Effects of emphasizing hypothetico-predictive reasoning within the science learning cycle on high school students' process skills and conceptual understanding in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1127-1147.
Lavoie, D.R., & Good, R. (1988). The nature and use of prediction skills in biological computer simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 334-360.
Lawson, A.E. (1998). A better way to teach biology. The American Biology Teacher, 50, 266-278.
Lazarus, W., & Mora, F. (2000). Online content for low income and underserved Americans: The digital divide's new frontier. Santa Monica, CA: The Children's Partnership. Available online: http://www.childrenspartnership.org/pub/low_income/
The Learning Federation. (2004). http://www.learningfederation.org/building.html
Lehrer, R., & Chazen, D. (1998). Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Russell, E., Gomez, L., Reisner, B., & Edelson, D. (1997). The progress portfolio: Promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments. Proceedings of computer-supported collaborative learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., Spence, J.C., Paulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Appollonio, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458.
Mapp, K.L. (2002, April). Having their say: Parents describe how and why they are involved in their children's education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED464724)
Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J., & Pollock, J.E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McCombs, B.L. (1997). Self-assessment and reflection: Tools for promoting teacher changes toward learner-centered practices. NASSP Bulletin, 81(587), 1-14.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Shepard, L.A. (with O'Day, J. A.). (1995). Improving education through standards-based reform. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED387867)
Means, B., & Olson, K. (1997). Technology and education reform. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Contract No. RP91-172010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Meyer, B. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Education Research Journal, 21, 121-144.
Michalchik, V., Rosenquist, A., Kozma, R., Kreikemeier, P., Schank, P., & Coppola, B. (submitted). Representational Competence and Chemical Understanding in the High School Chemistry Classroom. Submitted to Journal of the Learning Sciences.
Miller, D.L., & Kelley, M.L. (1994). The use of goal setting and contingency contracting for improving children's homework performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 27(1), 73-84.
Molnar, A. S. (1997). Computers in education: a brief history. T. H. E. Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 24(11), 63-69. Retrieved February 23, 2003, from http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A1681.cfm
Moore, D. W., & Readence, J.E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78 (1), 11-17.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1982). Pupil perceptions of teacher praise. Elementary School Journal, 82(421-434).
Moss, M., & Puma, M. (1995). Prospects: The congressionally mandated study of educational growth and opportunity: Language minority and English language learners. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Mueller, D.D. (1973). Teacher questioning practices in reading. Reading World, 12(2), 136-145. National Council of Teachers of English (1996). Standards in the teaching of English Language Arts. International Reading Associates. Available online: http://www.reading.org/resources/issues/reports/learning_standards.html
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983) A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Neubecker, M. (2003) Simulation as an instructional tool. Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University. Online: http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/simulations/index
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Newmann, F.M., Bryk, A.S., & Nagaoka, J.K. (2001). Improving Chicago's schools. Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence? Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved May 27, 2004, from www.consortium-chicago.org/publications/pdfs/p0a02.pdf
Nitko, A. (1996). Educational assessment of students (2nd. Ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110. (2002). Novick, R. (1998). Learning to read and write: A place to start. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Nye, P., Crooks, T. J., Powlie, M., & Tripp, G. (1984). Student note-taking related to university examination performances. Higher Education, 13(1), 85-97.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ogle, D. S. (1986). K-W-L group instructional strategy. In A. S. Palincsar, D. S. Ogle, B. F. Jones, & E. G. Carr (Eds.), Teaching reading as thinking (Teleconference Resource Guide, pp. 11-17). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Oosterhof, A. (1999). Developing and using classroom assessments (2nd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Orlich, C, Harder, R., Callahan, R., Trevisian, M., & Brown, A. (2004). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Owsten, R. D. (1997). The World Wide Web: A Technology to Enhance Teaching and Learning? Educational Researcher 26(2), 27-33.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Papert, S. (2000). What's the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of power. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3&4). Available online: http://www.researh.ibm.com/journal/sj/393/part2/papert.html
Peck, K. L., & Dorricott, D. (1994). Why use technology? Educational Leadership, 51(7), 11-15. Retrieved February 5, 2003, from http://www.ascd.org/readingroom/edlead/9404/peck.html
Pressley, M., Symons, S., McDaniel, M.A., Snyder, B.L., & Turnure, J.E. (1988). Elaborative interrogation facilitates acquisition of confusing facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 268-278.
Randel, J.M., Morris B.A., Wetzel, C.D., & Whitehill, B.V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: a review of recent research. Simulation and Gaming, 23(3), 261-276.
Ratterman, M.J., & Gentner, D. (1998). More evidence for a relationship shift in the development of analogy: Children's performance on a causal-mapping task. Cognitive Development, 13(4), 453-478.
Ravitch, D. (1995). National standards in American education: A citizen's guide. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Redfield, D. L., & Rousseau, E. W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(2), 237-245.
Reeve, J. M. (1996). Motivating others: Nurturing inner motivational resources. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Renzulli, J., & Smith, L. (1978). The compactor. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Reyhner, J. (1992). American Indians out of school: A review of school-based causes and solutions. Journal of American Indian Education, 31(3), 37-56.
Risner, G.P., Nicholson, J.I. & Webb, B. (1994). Levels of comprehension promoted by the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Program. Florence: University of North Alabama. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 381 751)
Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1996). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 455-467.
Roderique, T.W., Polloway, E.A., Cumblad, C.L., & Epstein, M.H. (1994). Homework: A survey of policies in the United States. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(8), 481-487.
Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Ross, J. A. (1988). Controlling variables: A meta-analysis of training studies. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 405-437.
Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (2000). Chapter 18: The evolution of instruction in technology-rich classrooms. The Jossey-Bass Reading on Technology and Learning (pp. 225-276). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Schacter, J. (1999). The Impact of education technology on student achievement. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange in Education Technology.
Schrage, M. (1989). No more teams! Mastering the dynamics of creative collaboration. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Sigel, I., McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A., & Goodnow, J. (1992). Introduction to the second edition. In I. Sigel, A. McGillicuddy-DeLisi, & J. Goodnow (Eds.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (2nd ed., pp. xiii-xv). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shore, R. (1998). Ready schools: the National Education Goals Panel. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
Slavin, R.E. (1987). Ability grouping on student achievement in elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Research of Educational Research, 57, 293-336.
Slavin, R. E. (1993). Ability grouping in middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives. Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 535-552. (EJ 464 542)
Smith, P. L., & Wedman, J. F. (1988). Read-think-aloud protocols: A new data-source for formative evaluation. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1(2), 13-22
Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Solomon, I. (1995). Analogical transfer and "functional fixedness" in the science classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 87(6), 371-377.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stokes, S. M. (1999). A Partnership for Creating a Multicultural Teaching Force: A Model for the Present. Multicultural Education, 7(1):8-12
Stone, C. L. (1983). A meta-analysis of advanced organizer studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 51(7), 194-199.
Tannenbaum, J. 1996. Practical ideas on alternative assessment for ESL students. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ERIC Digest ED395500).
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum and Supervision Development.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum and Supervision Development
Tombari, M., & Borich, G. (1999). Authentic assessment in the classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Tovani, C. (2004). Do I really have to teach reading?. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.
Trammel, D.J., Schloss, P.J., & Alper, S. (1994). Using self-recording and graphing to increase completion of homework assignments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 75-81.
Trumble, E., C. Rothstein-Fisch, and P. M. Greenfield. (2000). "Bridging cultures in our schools: New approaches that work." Knowledge Brief. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
Trumbull, E., Rothstein-Fisch, C., Greenfield, P.M., & Quiroz, B. (2001). Bridging cultures between home and school: A guide for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tyson, P. (1991). Talking about lesson planning: The use of semi-structured interviews in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly. 18(3), 87-96.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Introduction: No Child Left Behind.
Valdez, G., & McNabb, M. (1999). Computer-based technology and learning: Evolving uses and expectations. Oakbrook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Vanderbilt, Cognition and Technology Group. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Overwalle, F., & De Metsenaere, M. (1990). The effects of attribution-based intervention and study strategy training on academic achievement in college freshmen. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 299-311.
Viadero, D, (2004, April 21). Keys to success. Education Week.
Vogt, W. P. (1993). Dictionary of statistics and methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Vollmer, D.J. (1995). The effects of goal setting on homework behavior, self-efficacy, and attributional aspirations of high school students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(4-A).
Voltz, D.L. (1994). Developing collaborative parent-teacher relationships with culturally diverse parents. Intervention in School & Clinic, 29(5), 288-291.
Walberg, H. J. (1999). Productive teaching. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), New directions for teaching practice and research, 75-104. Berkeley, CA: McCutchen Publishing Corporation.
Welch, M. (1997, April). Students' use of three-dimensional modeling while designing and making a solution to a technical problem. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Weiner, B. (1994). Integrating social and personal theories of achievement strivings. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 557-573.
Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.
White, B.Y., & Frederickson, J.R. (1997). The ThinkerTools inquiry project: Making scientific inquiry accessible to students. Princeton, NJ: Center for Performance Assessment, Educational Testing Service.
White, B.Y., & Frederickson, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16(1):3-117.
Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessing student performances: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wiersma, U. (1992). The effects of extrinsic reward on intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 101-114.
Wilburn, K.T., & Felps, B.C. (1983). Do pupil grading methods affect middle school students' achievement? A comparison of criterion-referenced versus norm-referenced evaluation. Jacksonville, FL: Wofson Senior High School. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 229-451)
Wilson, T. D., & Linville, P. W. (1982). Improving the academic performance of college freshmen: Attribution theory revisited. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 42, 367-376.
Woloshyn, V.E., Willoughby, T., Wood, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Elaborative interrogation facilitates adult learning of factual paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 513-524.
Yair, G. (2000). Reforming motivation: How the structure of instruction affects students' learning experiences. British Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 191-210.
Yorks, P., & Follo, E. (1993). Engagement rates during thematic and traditional instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 363 412)